Philosophers are Tortured SoulsAn Autoethnographic Inquiry into the Unwritten Architecture of the Mind
← All essays

The Hamster Wheel of Love

On the ethics of interdependency, secular meaning-making, and the privilege of mutual weight-bearing

·9 min read

A lot of people write about love and relationships. It is almost like being with someone is the whole point of being alive. You grow up, you find the one, you get married and live happily ever after. We spend our entire lives pursuing love as though it is the finish line, the proof that we made it, the thing that will finally make everything else make sense.

The culture handed us a definition of love that is feeling-driven. The rush of falling in love. The butterflies you feel in your chest when you are attracted to someone. The high of being in love, where suddenly you are lifted out of ordinary reality into a world where only the two of you exist. For a while it feels like nothing can come between you. The rest of life, its noise and weight and boredom, falls away. You are untouchable together. And for a while, you both feel it. That mutuality is real. The problem is not that the feeling exists. The problem is that the culture told you it was all you needed.

And then, quietly, it is not enough.

Because what the culture called love was, in large part, a chemical reaction. Dopamine flooding your brain. Norepinephrine making your heart race. A temporary suppression of the parts of your mind that notice flaws and calculate risk. Your body manufactured the feeling. And underneath all of it, quieter but more honest, was a sexual need looking for a socially acceptable container. We dressed it up in the language of soulmates and destiny because naked desire felt like too small a reason to reorganize your entire life around another person. This is not to say that love is only sex. It is to say that sexual desire is one of the primary engines the culture hid inside the language of love, and hiding it made it almost impossible to see clearly.

Desire narrows what you can see. It does not reveal the person in front of you. It constructs them. We said love is blind as though it were a charming quirk rather than a precise description of what was actually happening. You were not seeing the person in front of you. You were seeing what you needed them to be. And they, sensing what you needed, became it. Or tried to. People are remarkably good at performing the version of themselves that keeps someone they desire close. This is not change. Change is something that grows from the inside, something you do for yourself. What happens in desire is something else entirely. You suppress the parts that might cost you the person. You amplify the parts that seem to be working. And they are doing exactly the same thing. But a performance has a run time. Eventually the effort of maintaining a self that was never quite true becomes exhausting. They drop it. You drop it. And you call that change. You say they are not the person you met. You are right. But they did not change. They just got tired of performing. And if you are honest, so did you.

The desire did not reveal either of you to each other. It constructed two people who did not quite exist. And when both constructions collapsed, you were left standing in front of a stranger, and they were standing in front of one too.

So you do what the culture taught you to do. You watch something on Netflix and a character tells you that love makes you weak. You think to yourself: Yeah, I’ll do better next time around. You learn the wrong lesson from the right pain. You armor up instead of opening up.

And this is how a hamster wheel works. Not through force. Through hope. Every new relationship carries the genuine hope that this time will be different. Every heartbreak feels like important data, like you are learning something, like you are getting closer. The effort feels real because it is real. And so, you start another lap.

I should say here that I have never been inside this culture. I did not receive it the way most people did. After my schooling years, I watched it happen in real time. Friends disappeared. Not because the friendship meant nothing, but because they were busy getting on the wheel. The calls got fewer. The plans never materialized. Everyone consumed by the search, by the relationship, by the maintenance of the feeling. And the ones who did find someone became a world of two. Sealed. Complete in their own eyes. They no longer needed me, or anyone outside the relationship, because the culture told them that finding the one means the one should be enough. I was still there, on the outside, watching people I knew disappear entirely into a togetherness that had no room for anyone else. The culture had done exactly what it was designed to do.

The culture sold us love as a feeling because feelings are instant gratification. They fit into songs and movies in a way that reality never could. And so the wheel keeps spinning, fed by the same story, over and over again.

Until you don’t. Some people exit the wheel not through wisdom but through exhaustion. They have run long enough, loved hard enough, lost enough times, that the hunger for the feeling quietly dies. And in that stillness, sometimes for the first time, they begin to see something they could not see while they were running. That love was never the feeling. That the feeling was just the door. And that the door was never the destination. The exit from the wheel was never a better feeling. It was this: Two people choosing to carry each other.

That is what love is. Not a metaphor for sacrifice, not a feeling, but two people who mutually choose to hold each other’s full weight.

It means holding the full reality of another person. Not the version of them that is convenient, not the version performing their best self, but their actual weight. Their fear that resurfaces even after years of working on it. Their patterns that do not fully resolve. Their failures. Their contradictions. The parts of them that are not easy to love in any simple sense. You hold all of that, and you do not put it down when it becomes inconvenient.

This requires a self that is genuinely strong. Not performing strength, not the strength that refuses to ask for help, but the interior kind. The kind that can hold weight without collapsing into resentment. The kind that gives without keeping score. The kind that does not need to be thanked for every act of holding because the holding itself is the point.

Most people arrive at love before they have built this strength. They arrive full of feeling and short on capacity. And the feeling convinces them they are ready. The feeling is not a reliable guide to readiness.

But carrying is only half of it. The other half is what breaks most people who consider themselves good at love.

You must also be able to be carried.

And that requires something the culture never taught alongside its love stories. It requires that you believe you are worth carrying. Not the performed version of you, not the version that has it together, but the actual you, the one that is tired and unfinished and sometimes too heavy even for yourself. If you do not believe you deserve to be held, you will never let anyone hold you. You will keep giving because giving feels safe and receiving feels like asking someone to love a person you do not fully love yet.

What carrying and being carried looks like from the outside is almost nothing. It looks like two people having dinner without performing for each other. It looks like one person sitting with another through something difficult without trying to fix it. It looks like asking for help and the help arriving without ceremony. It looks like showing up, again, on an ordinary day, for no reason except that you said you would and you mean it. Follow through, over a long time, is what love actually looks like.

Love at this level cannot be faked. The feeling can be manufactured, performed, mistaken for something it is not. The practice cannot. Either you are carrying someone or you are not. Either you can receive or you cannot.

You choose each other. You carry them. You let them carry you. Not because it is always beautiful but because carrying each other makes life easier. And that, more than any feeling, is what love is actually for.

The wheel does not stop because you find the right person. It stops because you become someone who no longer needs the rush to stay. And in that stillness, something becomes visible that was never visible while you were running. It was never the feeling. It was always something higher. A consciousness that two people arrive at together, not through passion, but through the daily practice of carrying each other. That is the highest form of love.

If you know the U2 song “One”, go back and listen to it again. Not as a love song. Not as a wedding anthem. Listen for the line that says “we get to carry each other”. Not we have to. We get to. Hear it now as the privilege it was always describing. Two people choosing each other not because the feeling demands it, but because carrying each other is the highest thing they have found to do with their lives.


This was published on Substack on May 29, 2026. https://noorvoss.substack.com/p/the-hamster-wheel-of-love